Proposals of #4

Fixing Centralization From Gamed Stakedrop

Exec Legacy Content
rejected
Expected result
Turnout / Quorum
27.39% / 33.40%
Voting start 2021.10.12 at 14:10:58
Voting end 2021.10.17 at 14:10:58
7.12%
792 405 juno
Yes
56.36%
6 270 963 juno
No
0.68%
75 129 juno
Veto
35.84%
3 988 168 juno
Abstain

Details

logo
Proposer
-
Total deposit
501 juno
Submit time
2021.10.07 at 14:10:41
Deposit end time
2021.10.17 at 14:10:41

Description

This is the account that gamed the fair stakedrop.

www.mintscan.io/juno/account/juno1aeh8gqu9wr4u8ev6edlgfq03rcy6v5twfn0ja8

It has 2.5 million Juno instead of 50k (Which was the max per account)

One of the main reasons for this proposal is that this address has staked the majority to one validator. This action is centralizing the network. They also did not delegate until Juno started trading on Osmosis. This would indicate that it was done so that it would be impossible to just restart the chain with this amount changed to 50k.

They just started to redelegate 250k Juno to SG1, which is the second biggest validator I can only assume because of the backlash. SG1 is the 2nd biggest validator so they don’t seem to understand the concept of decentralization. By not fixing this issue now it will lead to long term centralized governance issues.

I propose that we blacklist/delete 90% of the Juno in this account. This action is not done lightly. By the time this proposal goes through, they will not have been able to undelegate in time to prevent the decision of governance.

By voting yes to this proposal you agree that the Juno tokens in this account be reduced by 90% and that future blacklisting/reducing of coins should not be taken lightly.

Votes

Voter
Answer